The 3700X has double the 元 cache of both the 17, and the 3700X is 600-700 MHz and 300-400 MHz faster than the 1700 and the 2700 respectively. The main difference between the 3700X and its predecessors is cache size and frequency. Here are the specifications of each 8 core Ryzen CPU I’ve tested. This time around, I’ve also decided not to test at stock but overclocked in regards to both the CPU cores and the DRAM.
#Civ 6 benchmark ai average turn time update
And finally, the original 8 core analysis is actually our most viewed original article and most viewed review, so an update would be very beneficial. Games like Dota 2, the Division 2, and Total War: Attila, though valid games to test, don’t exactly impart useful data Dota 2 can run on any CPU, the Division 2 is only worth testing on the in game benchmark, and Total War: Attila barely runs on any CPU.
Secondly, I want to test some newer (and also less) games. Firstly, I originally wanted to test the 1700 but was unable to due to time constraints. I have decided to run this test again, however, for a few reasons.
That isn’t to say that Ryzen 3000 CPUs and Zen 2 CPUs as a whole aren’t great they are, but that particular upgrade wasn’t very compelling to me, and I instead suggested the 3600 because it provides similar multi core performance to the 2700, greater single threaded performance, similar gaming performance to the 3700X, and comes in at a much lower price. The ~20% single thread performance improvement Ryzen 3000 brings is technologically impressive, but it’s hard to recommend a $330 upgrade for just 20% more performance (or less, especially in games). Last August, I compared the 3700X to the 2700 (stock and overclocked) and came to the conclusion that upgrading to the 3700X from the 2700 didn’t make a ton of sense.
0 kommentar(er)
